The Point of the Holiday Season to an Atheist


Friday evening, I decided to tape up my ankle and jump on the treadmill. It had been 8 days since I sprained it. This is what it looked like the night of the injury:
And now, eight days later:
I didn't want to risk another injury by running outside again, and frankly, I wasn't even sure if I'd be able to do it.
It's been over a week and, although I've been off the crutches for several days, I'm still taking Vicodin and Motrin for pain pretty regularly. Plus, my foot's sportin' every color of the rainbow. I started off at a slow walk/limp pace for a couple of minutes and then tried to step it up to a slow jog. Well, let me tell you, that sucked. Treadmill said 3MPH and my ankle felt like someone had shoved a bunch of broken glass inside my ankle joint. I really thought that was it. I was going to have to quit. I really wanted to spend at least 10 minutes on the treadmill before giving up, so I tried to push through the pain for at least a few minutes with the thought that I'd walk for 5 minutes if I had to, but I wanted to at least run some of it. Well, after a minute or two, the ankle settled down and didn't hurt quite as much, so I kept going. Every step was painful, but ultimately I was able to suck it up and get 3.5 miles in. The pace was pitifully slow (about 45 minutes), but it's more than I expected, so I'm pleased with it. I took today off to rest it, and I haven't decided if I'll go again tomorrow or wait until Monday. It'll depend how it feels and how much pain I'm in the mood to tolerate. I really hate running treadmills, but I think I need the predictability to minimize the risk of re-injury until my ankle is a little stronger and a little less sore.I'm a week late, but I just caught the series premier of Stargate Universe.

I use VMWare Fusion to run Windows Vista on my Mac for work. I was in there when I was notified by Apple of an update to the iPhone software. I switched over to iTunes (in OS X) and initiated the update. i then switched back to Windows to proceed with my work while the update ran.
Unfortunately, one of the steps in the update was for the phone to restart. Well, naturally, when the phone attempted to restart, Windows recognized the new device and started to install device drivers for it. I cancelled the driver install and switched back to iTunes, but it was too late. The update failed because iTunes lost its connection with the phone (due to Windows trying to snatch it up). It forced a phone restore, which I attempted. The first attempt failed. I had to disconnect the phone and reset it manually, then run the restore again. It succeeded on the second attempt, but it completely wiped everything from the device. I'm currently in the process of reloading all my apps, music, pictures, etc. This will take a while, and I've lost trivial things like the locations of apps on screens and other settings, but it appears that no data was lost. I just hope when it's done that I haven't lost all my email and calendar (CalDAV) settings. This will be a pain to reconfigure. Ugh!
I've put a few hours into Wave, and I know that doesn't make me an expert by any stretch, but there's one little piece of perspective I'd like to offer. Right now, we have some of the smartest, techiest geeks on the planet in there with their hundreds of thousands of Twitter and Friendfeed followers. Whenever someone like Scoble or Steve Rubel starts a wave, half the US tech population wants to jump in and be involved with these Internet Icons. I'm not saying that's good or bad, but I am suggesting that it may not be a typical use-case. it's like jumping on a conference call with 8000 of your closest friends and everyone trying to talk at once. I think when some of the hype dies down, people will start using it in smaller groups for more specific conversations and the interactions won't be nearly as confusing. I'm also guilty of this because none of my personal contacts is on Wave yet, so I'm stuck driving the Autobon on my unicycle and trying to keep up without getting run over. Once I have some personal contacts on Wave and can engage them in more focused conversations, I'll have a better idea what niche (if any, as Rubel suggests) this fills.
Testing the ability for Google Wave to post to my Posterous blog using the Posterous robot for Wave
This is a test post. Trying to see how formatting works when posting from a wavelet to posterous and also how/whether or not it does the auto-post thing to twitter/facebook, etc.Also, instructions say "You can change your post settings before posting a blog by replying '/site'." Not sure what this means.
Obama's decision to change the plans regarding the Missile Defense Shield that was originally supposed to be deployed in Poland (with tracking systems in Chech Republic) was a very welcome change of direction by the Russian Government, which always thought these missiles were being put in place as a threat to them as opposed to defense against Iranian ambitions.
In response to this new development, the Russian government is planning to scrap its own plans to deploy counter-measures near the border of Poland.
I see the potential for a course-correction in relations between the US and Russia. There's much to be worked out. The US is pressuring Russia to support Sanctions against Iran because of their unwillingness to stop their nuclear program. However, Russia is reluctant to go along with such plans because of the depth of their trade relations with Iran.
Russia has not yet given any signals that it's ready to go along with these sanctions, but I believe there's reason for optimism in light of this new information.
A thought occurred to me today as I was listening to a Newshour podcast. They were discussing the fact that President Obama is killing GW Bush's plans for the Missile Shield in Poland and Czech Republic and replacing it with a new program that he feels more effectively addresses the immediate threat posed by the Iran missile program.
They had two guests on the program, as they often do. One of them agrees with the new plan and the other thinks the change is a mistake. This post isn't really about the defensive system itself, so I'll only recap briefly. Essentially, the President's position is that the old system was being designed to defend against ICBM threats posed by Iran. The assertion is that this Iranian ICBM program is moving more slowly than estimates indicated, but that short and medium range missile tests are progressing more quickly. Furthermore, the missile shield dreamt up by the former President has never been developed and has never been demonstrated to be feasible. So, President Obama is proposing a program that will more effectively defend against these short and medium range missile attacks which are considered far more imminent. The proponent suggested that the old system was a system that didn't work going up against a threat that didn't exist. The opponents of the plan think the President is giving in to Russian pressure and, in the process, leaving US interests and allies in eastern Europe vulnerable to attack. I tend to think that re-aligning our strategic assets to meet the needs as they exist today instead of trying to anticipate a need 15 years out with technology that has never been shown to work with any reliability is a far more pragmatic approach. And this doesn't even begin to account for the goodwill gained from major players in the region by stopping a program that, since its inception, has been very unpopular to all involved. Here's what I thought was interesting. One camp is sitting here telling us the recent changes are a big mistake for the reasons outlined above. The other camp is trying to convince us that this new plan is the only sensible option. We, the viewers and listeners, the voting public, are left in the middle trying to figure out who to believe. All the while, we have the President and his staff sitting in their offices laughing at how utterly naive we all are. They clearly have a plan, but no one outside his circle knows what it is. We're all left to grope in the dark while he looks on from on high. I'm generally a left leaning person and have supported our President in most regards. I'm not suggesting that this situation is unique to Barack Obama, our current President. This little dance would be occurring no matter who was President and it happens for all issues, not just this missile shield. I don't see a solution to this. Despite all the noble claims of transparency, there are just some things that the government will not allow to be public, and I'm sure the real reasons for this change are among them. Furthermore, unless we make ourselves experts on the dynamics of eastern European affairs and United States Foreign Policy, we can't hope to figure this out for ourselves. So who do we trust, mainstream media? They presumably have the experts who can help sort out some of these details, but they're so biased toward their political alignments that we're still left trying to interpret the findings of our 'independent' sources. I don't think there's an easy answer.